Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bigbubbatd" data-source="post: 722551" data-attributes="member: 10784">Not sure why people keep saying this. Even if the rookies would have had good years we still would have had to replace Shields and Hyde. It means they are not stars but they are definitely not a waste yet.It means there were not huge holes on this team outside certain spots on defense. The offense didn't have holes the staff deemed worthy of a pick before the late 4th and I agree with that. This team came in with the need for depth, talent, and athleticism in the secondary and it seems like they got that. They needed help at Olb and they may have waited too long in most people's mind although I was high on Biegel from the start. Loved his value in the middle rounds compared to what was available late first and in the second.The defense got an influx of players who have the tools to help. Time to coach them up. Whitt has pieces to make a secondary now.</blockquote>

Total: 587 (members: 2, guests: 585)