Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So does this years 1 and 2 picks mean 2015 was a waste?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigbubbatd" data-source="post: 722551" data-attributes="member: 10784"><p>Not sure why people keep saying this. Even if the rookies would have had good years we still would have had to replace Shields and Hyde. It means they are not stars but they are definitely not a waste yet.</p><p></p><p>It means there were not huge holes on this team outside certain spots on defense. The offense didn't have holes the staff deemed worthy of a pick before the late 4th and I agree with that. This team came in with the need for depth, talent, and athleticism in the secondary and it seems like they got that. They needed help at Olb and they may have waited too long in most people's mind although I was high on Biegel from the start. Loved his value in the middle rounds compared to what was available late first and in the second.</p><p></p><p>The defense got an influx of players who have the tools to help. Time to coach them up. Whitt has pieces to make a secondary now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigbubbatd, post: 722551, member: 10784"] Not sure why people keep saying this. Even if the rookies would have had good years we still would have had to replace Shields and Hyde. It means they are not stars but they are definitely not a waste yet. It means there were not huge holes on this team outside certain spots on defense. The offense didn't have holes the staff deemed worthy of a pick before the late 4th and I agree with that. This team came in with the need for depth, talent, and athleticism in the secondary and it seems like they got that. They needed help at Olb and they may have waited too long in most people's mind although I was high on Biegel from the start. Loved his value in the middle rounds compared to what was available late first and in the second. The defense got an influx of players who have the tools to help. Time to coach them up. Whitt has pieces to make a secondary now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
Poppa San
scheeler
Catamount1971
rmontro
Latest posts
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
54 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
58 minutes ago
College Sports
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 8:12 AM
All Other Sports
H
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:23 AM
Draft Talk
H
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:19 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
So does this years 1 and 2 picks mean 2015 was a waste?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top