Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 920273" data-attributes="member: 10247"><p>If Snacks would be an upgrade over Slaton then you absolutely sign him (provided the money thing is right.) I understand that it takes snaps away from a rookie with potential but don't you want the best guys you can get on the field?  I'm guessing Snacks is nothing close to what he once was and quite possibly would not present an upgrade over Slaton and that, along with money demands possibly, is why he is unemployed right now.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 594 (members: 0, guests: 594)