Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Should we draft 2 safeties
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HyponGrey" data-source="post: 541366" data-attributes="member: 6441"><p>Buchannon is a more physical Burnett. Burnett has the coverage skills, he's just limited in how much he can cover. I have a lot more confidence in Burnett hitting the weights than I do that he all of a sudden magically increases his range. </p><p></p><p>The problem with Buchannon, Richardson, or Polamalu types is that they're only effective if you're in single high and you have someone (read: Earl Thomas/Ryan Clark) capable of covering the field on the back end. I'd be curios to see the numbers on how often we actually played single high this year with our miserable personnel. Having Buchannon isn't much use when the RB is picking up 5 yards before Buchannon even gets a shot to hit him. There's a reason Jennings consistently started.</p><p></p><p>I no longer view Burnett as a viable FS, it's SS or bust. Let him cover TE and shade RB.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HyponGrey, post: 541366, member: 6441"] Buchannon is a more physical Burnett. Burnett has the coverage skills, he's just limited in how much he can cover. I have a lot more confidence in Burnett hitting the weights than I do that he all of a sudden magically increases his range. The problem with Buchannon, Richardson, or Polamalu types is that they're only effective if you're in single high and you have someone (read: Earl Thomas/Ryan Clark) capable of covering the field on the back end. I'd be curios to see the numbers on how often we actually played single high this year with our miserable personnel. Having Buchannon isn't much use when the RB is picking up 5 yards before Buchannon even gets a shot to hit him. There's a reason Jennings consistently started. I no longer view Burnett as a viable FS, it's SS or bust. Let him cover TE and shade RB. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
34 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: gopkrs
43 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 10:35 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Should we draft 2 safeties
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top