Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Should the Packers Consider trading for Isabella
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 884125" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Here's what's silly--</p><p></p><p>1) Ignoring the losses of Funchess and ESB simply because they happened before the season. That's completely arbitrary. They still happened after virtually all means of adding significant help to an NFL roster had come and gone (i.e. the draft and free agency). </p><p></p><p>2) Acting as though there are starting caliber wide receivers out there for the taking in late July and beyond, or assuming that there have been great options available and the Packers are just content to be worse than they otherwise could be. Additionally, criticizing them for not making a trade in the first month of the season, when trades are practically non-existent in the NFL. </p><p></p><p>3) Continuing to ***** about your draft day disappointments five months after the fact when the Packers' offense is the best in the NFL in basically every significant category. </p><p></p><p>To answer your question, since 9/27, they've played one game, they scored 30 points, and they won handily. I thought you would have known that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 884125, member: 12283"] Here's what's silly-- 1) Ignoring the losses of Funchess and ESB simply because they happened before the season. That's completely arbitrary. They still happened after virtually all means of adding significant help to an NFL roster had come and gone (i.e. the draft and free agency). 2) Acting as though there are starting caliber wide receivers out there for the taking in late July and beyond, or assuming that there have been great options available and the Packers are just content to be worse than they otherwise could be. Additionally, criticizing them for not making a trade in the first month of the season, when trades are practically non-existent in the NFL. 3) Continuing to ***** about your draft day disappointments five months after the fact when the Packers' offense is the best in the NFL in basically every significant category. To answer your question, since 9/27, they've played one game, they scored 30 points, and they won handily. I thought you would have known that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
GreenBaySlacker
Latest posts
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wisky newbie
Latest: milani
Today at 2:09 PM
Introduce Yourself
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 1:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Should the Packers Consider trading for Isabella
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top