Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GleefulGary" data-source="post: 760550" data-attributes="member: 12583">For a lot of these guys, it's familiarity. Take CB for example. If you have a guy there who thrives in zone, but the coaches at the SR bowl want to practice more of a man, or even man press scheme, the guy who thrives in zone is gonna look bad. That doesn't mean he's bad, it's just situational. That's not to excuse Davenport either. His play simply hasn't been top 15 worthy at the SR bowl, but I still believe he can get there. As average watchers, we probably think there isn't a big difference between a 2 pt and 3 pt stance...and really, there isn't. But if you're unfamiliar with it, and you take a false step bc of that, it hurts your rush chances. That's just one example. The SR bowl doesn't mean we should ignore game tape. The game tape doesn't mean we should ignore the SR bowl. Use all of the information available, and don't be afraid to say you're wrong. Of course, some people, I won't name names, will never admit they're wrong.</blockquote>

Total: 345 (members: 1, guests: 344)