Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 833766">He's not been all that good for the last 1 1/2 seasons, there were rumblings after 2017 that he did not score well that season in terms of the "do your job" quotient, he's coming off injury, he's 30 years old with pretty high mileage in terms of snap count, he'd be an $8.5 mil one season rent-a-player for an acquiring team, and you'd want them to give up a draft pick for the privilege.He's in a similar to spot as Wilkerson last season who signed a one year rent-a-player deal for a lot less than a trading partner would have to assume with Daniels and that didn't require giving up a draft pick.There seems to be an impression among Packer fans that Daniels is close to the the same player he was when he signed this extension 4 seasons back at age 26 after his 3rd. season.  Or maybe those who advocate a trade want other teams to believe Daniels is close to that former self while they themselves do not.About the only way you'd see this trade happen is if a team who sees itself as a legit contender finds themselves is dire straights on their D-Line due to injuries.  And they'd have to have $8.5 mil in free cap space laying around.</blockquote>

Total: 1,102 (members: 2, guests: 1,100)