Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 1022052" data-attributes="member: 12283">For the community of people here who can see color, the above is why I say what I do about the Packers needs being feast/famine.Assuming that most guys in orange come back, you're basically set as is at QB, TE, WR, DL, and ED.You have serious holes to fill at RB, OL, LB, CB, and SAF. The thing I'm most curious about is how the team assesses the OL. There's a world where all they want is depth. Jenkins and Tom are entrenched starters, Walker has come on so strong that it's doubtful you could improve upon him with a rookie, the team seems very supportive of Myers despite some struggles, and Rhyan might claim Runyan's job moving forward. In that scenario, you just need backups (though you need them basically across the board).  But there's also a world where they want a lot more than that. Perhaps they aren't as enamored with the progress of Walker or Rhyan or both. Maybe their vocal support of Myers belies an internal view that he needs to go. In that scenario, you need competition/replacements for three starting roles. I tend to lean more towards the first view than the second. I want quality depth at tackle, legit competition for Rhyan at guard, and an heir apparent for Myers at center. Three picks on OL in the top 4 rounds wouldn't phase me a bit.</blockquote>

Total: 525 (members: 1, guests: 524)