Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Roster Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 762627" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I am talking about "depth" beyond the starters, so don't confuse that with the quality of the group with the 3 starters included. As far as "any position", I was talking about WR, so saying "any position" is somewhat irrelevant, especially when you consider how many WR's are used during a game. While I am not overly familiar with the other 31 teams depth beyond their top 3, we are talking about possibly releasing 1-2 of our top 3 receivers, so yes, our depth beyond Adams, Nelson and Cobb, should be considered. If Nelson and/or Cobb are released because of being overpaid and no WR FA's were signed, I am comfortable at saying, the Packers would not just be thin at WR, they would look like one of the worst WR groups in the NFL. You would be talking about starting 1-2 of the following players:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Geronimo Allison: Career: 35 receptions 455 yds. 2 TD's</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Trevor Davis: Career: 8 receptions 94 yds. 1 TD</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Jeff Janis: Career: 17 receptions 200 yds. 1 TD</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Michael Clark: 4 receptions 41 yds.</li> </ol><p>I am guessing that if you added up the career stats of those 4 players (64 receptions, 690 yds and 4 td's), you would be able to find quite a few teams that have a #2, #3 or a #4 WR that have not only equaled that in a career, but in one season.</p><p></p><p>Off the top of my head teams like the Patriots, Buccaneers, Falcons, Eagles, Saints, Steelers, Bengals and Jaguars have a deeper WR group and if you remove Cobb and/or Nelson, which is what this discussion was about, most teams in the NFL would probably have a much better and deeper group.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 762627, member: 7261"] I am talking about "depth" beyond the starters, so don't confuse that with the quality of the group with the 3 starters included. As far as "any position", I was talking about WR, so saying "any position" is somewhat irrelevant, especially when you consider how many WR's are used during a game. While I am not overly familiar with the other 31 teams depth beyond their top 3, we are talking about possibly releasing 1-2 of our top 3 receivers, so yes, our depth beyond Adams, Nelson and Cobb, should be considered. If Nelson and/or Cobb are released because of being overpaid and no WR FA's were signed, I am comfortable at saying, the Packers would not just be thin at WR, they would look like one of the worst WR groups in the NFL. You would be talking about starting 1-2 of the following players: [LIST=1] [*]Geronimo Allison: Career: 35 receptions 455 yds. 2 TD's [*]Trevor Davis: Career: 8 receptions 94 yds. 1 TD [*]Jeff Janis: Career: 17 receptions 200 yds. 1 TD [*]Michael Clark: 4 receptions 41 yds. [/LIST] I am guessing that if you added up the career stats of those 4 players (64 receptions, 690 yds and 4 td's), you would be able to find quite a few teams that have a #2, #3 or a #4 WR that have not only equaled that in a career, but in one season. Off the top of my head teams like the Patriots, Buccaneers, Falcons, Eagles, Saints, Steelers, Bengals and Jaguars have a deeper WR group and if you remove Cobb and/or Nelson, which is what this discussion was about, most teams in the NFL would probably have a much better and deeper group. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
gopkrs
Emur
SudsMcBucky
Pkrjones
Latest posts
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:29 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Roster Questions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
