Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="easyk83" data-source="post: 538546" data-attributes="member: 8895">You started out personal, and then you complained about me attacking the messenger, people in glasshouses.Indianapolis was a little over a year ago and it's merely the best illustration since Rodgers' took 2 sacks in the same series to kill the final potentially game winning drive. If you want to pretend that Aaron Rodgers is some sort of flawless Christ like figure, which essentially is what you were arguing since your freaked out at the idea of Aaron receiving SOME criticism, then be my guest. The rest of us will continue discussing Aaron's need to take less sacks, be more decisive in his reads on some of his reads hitting the first open man instead of hunting for the big play, and learn to play a more patient game against 2 deep alignments. No one is saying he is bad, no one is saying he should be replaced or was even the primary reason we lost. However he merely played well enough not to lose, but not well enough to win.</blockquote>

Total: 599 (members: 2, guests: 597)