Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rmontro" data-source="post: 773547" data-attributes="member: 12340"><p>I'm pretty sure that's the plan.</p><p></p><p>But the reason that I can see the other side here is that Rodgers is likely going to get a huge pay raise with his next contract. No team has won a Super Bowl with a quarterback who has taken up more than 13.1% of his team's salary cap. If someone thinks keeping Rodgers is going to price us out of the Super Bowl, I could see why they might go for the apocalyptic trade. AGAIN, I don't agree with that, but I can see their point.</p><p></p><p>I think TT got a little complacent over the years, and many fans had the same viewpoint: Rodgers is fairly young, the window isn't closing, as long as he can get us into the playoffs, we have a shot at the championship. But without fielding a good defense, they really weren't able to advance that far. So they weren't giving the team the best chance after all. And now, we've got Pettine, so there's hope, but if Rodgers' contract becomes a cap problem, the window may not have been open as wide or for as long as some have thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rmontro, post: 773547, member: 12340"] I'm pretty sure that's the plan. But the reason that I can see the other side here is that Rodgers is likely going to get a huge pay raise with his next contract. No team has won a Super Bowl with a quarterback who has taken up more than 13.1% of his team's salary cap. If someone thinks keeping Rodgers is going to price us out of the Super Bowl, I could see why they might go for the apocalyptic trade. AGAIN, I don't agree with that, but I can see their point. I think TT got a little complacent over the years, and many fans had the same viewpoint: Rodgers is fairly young, the window isn't closing, as long as he can get us into the playoffs, we have a shot at the championship. But without fielding a good defense, they really weren't able to advance that far. So they weren't giving the team the best chance after all. And now, we've got Pettine, so there's hope, but if Rodgers' contract becomes a cap problem, the window may not have been open as wide or for as long as some have thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scheeler
ExpatPacker
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
32 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top