Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 773478" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>Exactly, Rodgers' value is known and barring the catastrophic, he'll have a lot of value in 5 years as well. At this point there isn't a team that has enough draft capital to even make this interesting for what he has in value right now and for the future. I don't care if the Browns have 2 top 5 picks this year. Even if we took 2 QB's in the top 5 this year, odds are that QB never becomes half of what Rodgers has become. We could pick 2 top 5 QB's for the next decade and odds are 1 or 2 become even close to what Rodgers has become and on an inconsistent at best basis. WhyTF are we thinking of trading? and in 5 years should we decide that paying him isn't worth it anymore there will still be some team who thinks they're "close" with the team they've built and will believe Rodgers will have a season or 2 to put them over the top and will pay for it. </p><p></p><p>IF it even comes to that. Regardless, there is no way in hell I want to trade Rodgers now and forfeit the next 5 years of some of the best QB play this league has known, to see if we can hit the QB lottery again and remain relevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 773478, member: 10441"] Exactly, Rodgers' value is known and barring the catastrophic, he'll have a lot of value in 5 years as well. At this point there isn't a team that has enough draft capital to even make this interesting for what he has in value right now and for the future. I don't care if the Browns have 2 top 5 picks this year. Even if we took 2 QB's in the top 5 this year, odds are that QB never becomes half of what Rodgers has become. We could pick 2 top 5 QB's for the next decade and odds are 1 or 2 become even close to what Rodgers has become and on an inconsistent at best basis. WhyTF are we thinking of trading? and in 5 years should we decide that paying him isn't worth it anymore there will still be some team who thinks they're "close" with the team they've built and will believe Rodgers will have a season or 2 to put them over the top and will pay for it. IF it even comes to that. Regardless, there is no way in hell I want to trade Rodgers now and forfeit the next 5 years of some of the best QB play this league has known, to see if we can hit the QB lottery again and remain relevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Packer Fan in SD
Latest posts
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
58 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top