Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 762451" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>There is a difference between "consulting with" and "communicating with". Rodgers publicly stated that he wasn't happy that the Packers didn't "consult" with him about the decision on Van Pelt. </p><p></p><p>The definition of <strong>consult</strong>: "seek information or advice from (someone with expertise in a particular area)."</p><p></p><p>I get it, Rodgers is THE #1 player on the team, but consulting with him about decisions other than ones that players are typically consulted with, is going down a slippery slope in my opinion. Like I said before, if the Packers didn't inform AR of their decision before it was made public, I can see where he would be slightly put off, but should understand, he was being treated the same as the other 52+ players in the organization.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 762451, member: 7261"] There is a difference between "consulting with" and "communicating with". Rodgers publicly stated that he wasn't happy that the Packers didn't "consult" with him about the decision on Van Pelt. The definition of [B]consult[/B]: "seek information or advice from (someone with expertise in a particular area)." I get it, Rodgers is THE #1 player on the team, but consulting with him about decisions other than ones that players are typically consulted with, is going down a slippery slope in my opinion. Like I said before, if the Packers didn't inform AR of their decision before it was made public, I can see where he would be slightly put off, but should understand, he was being treated the same as the other 52+ players in the organization. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 12:09 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top