Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 762275" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>So would you give Rodgers the final say in the decision? How much say would he have? If his say doesn't carry much weight, why pretend that it does? If Rodgers is adamant about it being the wrong move and the team will regret not taking his advice, what than?</p><p></p><p>The only way I see this as being done better would be to sit AR down, before actually firing AVP and say "We just want to let you know that a decision has been made to let AVP go for these reasons and we felt it was important that you knew before it went public. What are your thoughts?" I'm sure part of the "hurt" that AR felt with the decision was hearing it through the media or other sources, feeling like he was left out of the process. I still don't think it was AR's decision, but if the Packers wanted to massage the ego of their #1 player, that might have been an approach that would have taken some of the sting out of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 762275, member: 7261"] So would you give Rodgers the final say in the decision? How much say would he have? If his say doesn't carry much weight, why pretend that it does? If Rodgers is adamant about it being the wrong move and the team will regret not taking his advice, what than? The only way I see this as being done better would be to sit AR down, before actually firing AVP and say "We just want to let you know that a decision has been made to let AVP go for these reasons and we felt it was important that you knew before it went public. What are your thoughts?" I'm sure part of the "hurt" that AR felt with the decision was hearing it through the media or other sources, feeling like he was left out of the process. I still don't think it was AR's decision, but if the Packers wanted to massage the ego of their #1 player, that might have been an approach that would have taken some of the sting out of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 12:09 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top