Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lare" data-source="post: 14145" data-attributes="member: 114">I think people are arguing two separate issues here.One, is if taking Rodgers in the first round was a wise draft pick or not. If you take into account Brett's situation at the time and only prescribe to the "BPA" only theory, it was probably a good pick and a good investment.The other is if the Packers have gotten, or ever will get, enough production from Rodgers to justify the draft pick and the money he'll be paid. This would lean more to those who feel it's wiser to draft BPA based on need. While the jury is still out on this one for another year or so, it's hard to agree that they've gotten $6 million worth of production from Rodgers so far. Of course, compared to our return on TT's $6 million investment in Sherman, Rodgers looks like something of a bargain.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 220 (members: 1, guests: 219)