Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LambeauLeaper" data-source="post: 22436" data-attributes="member: 162">Now you know.Sarcastic remarks aside, maybe we can try to see the point of my post instead of nitpicking the details.  Like I said about 5 posts above, my point has really nothing to do with Rich McKay, the Falcons, or a test to see how many people can completely miss the point of a post.  McKay's interview just made me think about how much Sherman loved projects when he was GM and TT seems to be on a similar track (don't read too much into that..I think TT is much wiser than Sherman, but we'll see).  Sure, every once in awhile a project will pan out.  I think Collins got that label, but is proving people wrong already - it's also way too early to put that in the books, though.  But, in the recent past, we seem to tend to go after the guys that "are fast" or are "great leapers" (ie. Ahmad Carroll).  I hear the term "raw" more often than not, it seems, when talking about Packer draft picks.It seems like the arguments I'm hearing here are trying to say that the Packers aren't that much different from other teams when it comes to drafting.  I'm sure that's true to an extent, but I still believe we go after "projects" earlier and more often than other teams.</blockquote>

Total: 666 (members: 2, guests: 664)