1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Rich McKay on "In the Herd" this morning...

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by LambeauLeaper, Sep 15, 2005.

  1. LambeauLeaper

    LambeauLeaper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    239
    Ratings:
    +0
    Atlanta Falcons GM Rich McKay was on ESPN radio this morning and talked a little bit about their draft strategy. I can't quote it word for word, but he basically said that they look for guys from big schools that produce. They avoid guys from the smaller schools that get drafted high because of speed or leaping ability. He said that's when you get into "potential/project" territory and there's risk involved.

    Basically, the Falcons have the exact opposite approach that the Packer's have. Hmm, interesting how they are headed up and we're headed down. This is what bothers me about Thompson the most. I'm not trying to rag on the guy - he's barely gotten his feet wet as our GM, but the little history he has here (and in Seattle, for that matter) show that he's much more interested in the long term. That's fine, but if he's constantly got his sights set on "3 years from now" then I think we're in trouble. You have to mix in a little urgency for the current team you have on the field. Another example is his decision to stand pat on adding a 5th receiver right now. Chatman as #3 and Murphy as #4 doesn't exactly make me feel comfortable - especially with Ferguson's inability to remain on the field. The likelihood of Chatman stepping into #2 brings back horrid memories of the Vikings game last January. I also read that Ferguson will be returning punts now? Why?!? To further endanger your now #2 receiver that can't stay healthy as it is? Makes no sense to me.
     
  2. P@ck66

    P@ck66 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,207
    Ratings:
    +0
    Leaper..

    That's a good point...how long have we been hearing that the Pack has to surround Favre with "talent" at wide-receiver...and Sherman's drafts two rookies (Ferguson and Walker) who take 2-3 years to "develop"...

    and what about the defensive line?

    Now Walker's out...and Ferguson is still unproven....there doesn't seem to be a sense of urgency amongst the pack to draft for need "today"...

    I was hoping that the Pack would have picked up Chad Morton (Giants) when he was cut from New England...To have Ferguson returning punts when they need the receivers that they have not getting hurt, and with Ferguson's his history, is highly questionable...
     
  3. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Well, guys, last I looked, we have some rookies starting and, by all accounts, doing pretty well. Colling has yet to make any of us cringe, and neither had Whitticker. Let's see what Murphy does in the coming weeks............
     
  4. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    Actually I believe Murphy will be our #3 this week and Chatman #4. I wouldn't sign someone just to sign someone. Pathon may still be an option but TT obviously wants to see what Murphy can do this week.
     
  5. tromadz

    tromadz Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,000
    Ratings:
    +3
    So Walker and Ferguson arent good?
     
  6. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Damn that Aaron Kampman....all he does is hustle and make plays!

    Just curious...is Southern Mississippi one of those "big time" programs he refers to.

    Walter Payton came from Jackson State...another powerhouse in collegiate ball.

    Jerry Rice...Mississippi Valley State..where you ask? Me too.

    Steve McNair and Donald Driver.....Alcorn State....a national terror on the gridiron.

    I am thinking you get my drift at this point.
     
  7. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    There is not a recipe for drafting. It's hit or miss.
     
  8. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    Walker and Ferguson were from big schools and both produced in college. It still took them time to develop as pros. It takes time for a lot of guys no matter what school you're from.
     
  9. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    And let us just go down the list of huge "big school" busts:

    Mandarich
    Marinovich
    Leaf
    McNown
    Michaels

    The list goes on and is a big one.
     
  10. CaliforniaCheez

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ted Thompson drafted "big school" or moderate large school guys with the exception of Collins, Coston, Campbell (Hawkins is in a unique category). Small school guys do take more time and are riskier so they should be taken later like Costin.

    Rogers(Pac10), Murphy(Texas A&M moderate large), Underwood(SD State moderate large), Popinga(Brigham Young moderate large), Montgomery(Texas A&M moderate large), Craig Bragg(Pac Ten), William Whitticker(Big 10).

    Coston and Campbell seem to prove the general rule and Collins is the exception to it.

    If you look around the league at the practice squads they are predominately small school guys.

    I tend to like Big Ten and Pac Ten guys who start. They have already gone through a lot to get there and have had good coaching in a competitive environment.

    There are exceptions like Jerry Rice so we should not be too prejudiced but generally the odds are as Mckay indicates.
     
  11. LambeauLeaper

    LambeauLeaper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    239
    Ratings:
    +0
    You guys are pretty much all missing the point. The point of the arguement wasn't "Big Schools vs. Small Schools", it's drafting "projects". Obviously there are going to be cases of busts from big schools and studs from small schools. But to make that the focal point of the arguement is missing the point.

    Also, I read later (after the first post in this thread) that they are still looking at Pathon and others and just want to see what they have with Murphy. That makes me feel better, because otherwise it felt like a complete lack of urgency to stand pat.
     
  12. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    They will still need an additional receiver...unless they are thinking Bragg should Murphy really shine.
     
  13. paxvogel

    paxvogel Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    501
    Ratings:
    +0
    Once you get into day two you are mostly drafting projects. There are probably 5 blue chippers per draft. About 20 Pro Bowl caliber players and then either steady players or you take a shot. I do think bigger programs will give you better offensive linemen however. :comp:
     
  14. spaulding

    spaulding Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    149
    Ratings:
    +0
    Let's remember 2 things

    1) It's McKay's 1st year in Atlanta

    2)His draft this year

    1 27(27) Sharod White WR UAB
    2 27(59) Jonathan Babineaux DT Iowa
    3 27(90) Jordan Beck OLB Cal Poly
    4 27(128) Chauncey Davis DE Florida St.
    5 24(160) Michael Boley OLB Southern Miss
    5 27(163) Frank Omiyale OT Tenn. Tech
    6 27(201) DeAndra Cobb HB Michigan St.
    7 27(241) Darrell Shropshire DT South Carolina

    I never knew UAB, Cal Poly, S. Miss, and TENN Tech were big schools
     
  15. LambeauLeaper

    LambeauLeaper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    239
    Ratings:
    +0
    Now you know.

    Sarcastic remarks aside, maybe we can try to see the point of my post instead of nitpicking the details. Like I said about 5 posts above, my point has really nothing to do with Rich McKay, the Falcons, or a test to see how many people can completely miss the point of a post. McKay's interview just made me think about how much Sherman loved projects when he was GM and TT seems to be on a similar track (don't read too much into that..I think TT is much wiser than Sherman, but we'll see). Sure, every once in awhile a project will pan out. I think Collins got that label, but is proving people wrong already - it's also way too early to put that in the books, though. But, in the recent past, we seem to tend to go after the guys that "are fast" or are "great leapers" (ie. Ahmad Carroll). I hear the term "raw" more often than not, it seems, when talking about Packer draft picks.

    It seems like the arguments I'm hearing here are trying to say that the Packers aren't that much different from other teams when it comes to drafting. I'm sure that's true to an extent, but I still believe we go after "projects" earlier and more often than other teams.
     
  16. FL Packer

    FL Packer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    9
    Ratings:
    +0
    Leaper,
    I think you are right. I've always been frustrated with us taking "speed" over "talent". Look at who we passed up last year because Carroll was faster...Chris Gamble and Mediue Williams...those two were drafted after Carroll and were projected ahead of Carrol by most analyst, but weren't as fast. They had outstanding rookie seasons. Same thing with Ferguson and Walker. They had great physical stats, but limited proven talent on the college level. Doesn't mean that they won't pan out eventually, but why take the "project" when we were obviously drafting a "need" position. You can't coach instinct...the thing that probably makes the most difference when all these top athletes hit the field...more so that 1/100th of a second in the 40 yard dash (especially considering these guys are running in a straight line, on turf, with no pads and don't have to cut, back peddle, bump, tackle, etc)

    It seems like the Packers were always drafting for a track meet not a football game.

    With TT, its obvious he was drafting best available player and I think he knew that Collins was being over looked by most teams. Baltimore called Thompson to congratulate him on the pick. That is about as big a compliment as you can get considering Baltimores track record with the draft.
     
  17. PackerTraxx

    PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,028
    Ratings:
    +0
    He contradicts himself with picks 1,3,5,5 and 7, I would not term those as "big schools that produce". That's 5 out of 8 picks. I wish he would follow his own advice, that will leave more good players on the board for us.

    TT has said he will take the best player available, personally I like that philosophy. I believe Collins, Murphy(the way it looks) and Whittacker contributing early is more than most teams. Drafting in the lower third you're not going to get blue chippers that can contribute right a way, as a rule.

    Sherman kept trading up to try to get immediate help and all it did was cost us draft choices.
     
  18. LambeauLeaper

    LambeauLeaper Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    239
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes, McKay seemed to contradict himself, but I was merely paraphrasing. I don't remember the interview verbatim as I was in my car on the way to work, but he likely said "we TRY to go for guys at the bigger schools". My whole point in even mentioning McKay is that he seems like a GM that has a clue what he's doing. Here's an old article from 2001 that I read about him while he was with Tampa Bay.
     
  19. spaulding

    spaulding Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    149
    Ratings:
    +0
    do you understand now that TB is in salary cap hell? They're at $672,000. And Mckay's gone. Maybe he is smart.
     
  20. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,486
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hey, there is talent at every level of collegiate ball who would qualify as immediate impact players and projects. Hell Ware from Troy State is probably going to be the best DE taken this draft and he is starting now.
     
  21. PackerTraxx

    PackerTraxx Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,028
    Ratings:
    +0
    Leaper, I think I get more what you're saying, if he said something like all other facets being equal and one guy is from a small school, the other guy from a big school he's take the one from the big school, I would agree.

    On the other hand, if you had a situation like Troy Vincent and T. Buckly, Wolf make a big mistake picking based on conferenes and who each player's respective team played. He should have picked on the players themselves. They were very equal on measureables except Vincent was 6'0" and 190 lbs. Buckly was 5'9" and 170 lbs. Also, Vincent was a higher character person. Wolf let the wrong factors weigh in, he should have picked the bigger, better person. Can you imagine the other areas we could have concentrated on if a key position like that is set for a dozen years?
     

Share This Page