Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Review Everything or Review Nothing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 816271"><p>While I believe the NO play was PI, I believe the outrage over that one play is overdone. On close examination, one can see the ball was hot, wide and already up on the receiver at contact. It would have been a very difficult catch. The ref may have passed on the flag thinking it was uncatchable, not the right call but understandable in the real time moment.</p><p></p><p>The call that should have drawn equal outrage was overriding the Edelman muffed punt call given the benefit of replay. If the criteria is "what most likely happened" then overturning the fumble would be correct. But that's not the criteria, is it? There needs to be clear evidence the ball did not touch him in order to overturn and that was not the case.</p><p></p><p>I don't have any dog in these hunts. If anything, I was mildly pulling for a NE-NO matchup.</p><p></p><p>The first thing the NFL needs to do, before implementing replay on PI calls as being mumbled about in the aftermath, is improving officiating quality control. There isn't much consistency from crew to crew. Some are flag happy, others "let them play", and generally there's more "let them play" as the season wears on then into the playoffs. Refs are out there rolling their own. The NFL has failed to address this for as long as I can remember.</p><p></p><p>My favorite pet peeve has been the PI call since long before this NO incident. There is little consistency in how the rule is applied. The NFL needs to do what they evidently did not do with the new roughing rules, putting together dozens of examples of OK/not OK clips, not 3 examples after the fact, then train the refs while making those tapes public to train the media and the fans. And it does not help that the NFL laid out those 3 roughing examples and then the refs promptly ignored them, nearly ignoring the new rule as the season wore on. Was that some kind of NFL double-secret instruction? And it further doesn't help that the NFL comes up with rules with the foresight of a mole.</p><p></p><p>The "roll your own" officiating culture is going to be hard to change. In light of that fact, on-the-job training may be required, in which case review of PI calls is in order. I'd make that a coaches call and give him a 3rd. challenge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 816271"] While I believe the NO play was PI, I believe the outrage over that one play is overdone. On close examination, one can see the ball was hot, wide and already up on the receiver at contact. It would have been a very difficult catch. The ref may have passed on the flag thinking it was uncatchable, not the right call but understandable in the real time moment. The call that should have drawn equal outrage was overriding the Edelman muffed punt call given the benefit of replay. If the criteria is "what most likely happened" then overturning the fumble would be correct. But that's not the criteria, is it? There needs to be clear evidence the ball did not touch him in order to overturn and that was not the case. I don't have any dog in these hunts. If anything, I was mildly pulling for a NE-NO matchup. The first thing the NFL needs to do, before implementing replay on PI calls as being mumbled about in the aftermath, is improving officiating quality control. There isn't much consistency from crew to crew. Some are flag happy, others "let them play", and generally there's more "let them play" as the season wears on then into the playoffs. Refs are out there rolling their own. The NFL has failed to address this for as long as I can remember. My favorite pet peeve has been the PI call since long before this NO incident. There is little consistency in how the rule is applied. The NFL needs to do what they evidently did not do with the new roughing rules, putting together dozens of examples of OK/not OK clips, not 3 examples after the fact, then train the refs while making those tapes public to train the media and the fans. And it does not help that the NFL laid out those 3 roughing examples and then the refs promptly ignored them, nearly ignoring the new rule as the season wore on. Was that some kind of NFL double-secret instruction? And it further doesn't help that the NFL comes up with rules with the foresight of a mole. The "roll your own" officiating culture is going to be hard to change. In light of that fact, on-the-job training may be required, in which case review of PI calls is in order. I'd make that a coaches call and give him a 3rd. challenge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
CarryTheG14
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: tynimiller
45 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:56 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:47 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Review Everything or Review Nothing?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top