Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 855856" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>That’s the million dollar question at WR.</p><p>GB needs to find a WR who isn’t part of a short term recipe and that may involve spending a draft pick on one. Personally, I’m hitting WR with either a 2020 day1 or day2 selection and putting them on the fast track to long term success.</p><p>As far as a more proven veteran option, there always seems to be a group of those WR (similar to Cobb) that teams are willing to walk away from in hopes of a team looking for the next long term solution above.</p><p></p><p> As we’ve learned the hard way in 2019, it’s probably not the best idea to walk away from multiple modest salaried veterans (Cobb/Montgomery etc..) unless we have a better grip on who is projected to improve the hole left at said position. We’ve walked 3 veteran day1 and 2 draft picks at WR in 2018-2019 without one proven replacement prospect for any of them.</p><p></p><p>I’d get after 1 FA + 1 earlier draft selection, both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 855856, member: 10086"] That’s the million dollar question at WR. GB needs to find a WR who isn’t part of a short term recipe and that may involve spending a draft pick on one. Personally, I’m hitting WR with either a 2020 day1 or day2 selection and putting them on the fast track to long term success. As far as a more proven veteran option, there always seems to be a group of those WR (similar to Cobb) that teams are willing to walk away from in hopes of a team looking for the next long term solution above. As we’ve learned the hard way in 2019, it’s probably not the best idea to walk away from multiple modest salaried veterans (Cobb/Montgomery etc..) unless we have a better grip on who is projected to improve the hole left at said position. We’ve walked 3 veteran day1 and 2 draft picks at WR in 2018-2019 without one proven replacement prospect for any of them. I’d get after 1 FA + 1 earlier draft selection, both. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Half Empty
Heyjoe4
tynimiller
shockerx
Latest posts
H
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Half Empty
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Heyjoe4
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
29 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: tynimiller
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
"Realistic" WR Discussions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top