Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 838869" data-attributes="member: 7261">Yup and I have been saying this for a long time, I would much rather see the Packers spend some extra money on the #2 QB in the event that #12 goes down.  Mainly for the reason you point out, it might be THE most important backup on the team.  TT seemed to try and get away most years with having a development guy behind his QB's, Favre (Rodgers) and the same with the #2 behind Rodgers.  Favre was an iron man, so that worked out just fine.  Rodgers as we have seen isn't quite as sturdy. Hundley was a terrible replacement and Kizer, not that much better.So yes, carrying what are basically 2 developmental QB's (Kizer and Boyle) behind your #1 is a waste of a roster spot IMO.  I hope it doesn't happen, but if Rodgers goes down again for any extended time, I would prefer Gute combing the streets for an old Vet to try and hold things together in the event that Kizer can't or gets hurt himself.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 297 (members: 1, guests: 296)