Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rodell330" data-source="post: 546293" data-attributes="member: 6676"><p>I don't hate TT nor am I bashing him but if he didn't take Rodgers he's not on this list. A lot of GM would still have jobs if they had taken Rodgers. We saw what the Patriots looked like without Brady and then what the Packers looked like without Rodgers so I don't wanna hear the "oh every team would struggle if they lost their franchise qb" because Cassel and Belliceck proved other wise still going 11-5?  And Chicago looked just as good with mccown then cutler so..I believe Rodgers has covered up not only mm's deficiencies but TT's as well. How long did it take for the TT to finally get a running game behind him ? And as of right now the defense still sucks.  If you put Rodgers in Minnesota ? even they win 11 games every yr.  Put him in Detroit? They may even have advanced to at least a SB and won. Would be interesting to see how Teddy would fair without him..oh wait we have. I'm stating facts not bashing TT so his supporters need not over react.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 366 (members: 2, guests: 364)