Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 446764" data-attributes="member: 5830">Who cares if someone says that it isn't relevant. They (you) need to explain why it isn't relevant for it to be considered in the discussion. Let's analyze the 1986-1988 seasons. The Packers went 4-12, 5-9-1, and 4-12 with only 5 of those 13 wins coming at home. Based on those numbers and how Mr. Fortenbaugh conducted his analysis, the Packers would be towards the bottom of the list for home field advantage. Is that still a relevant conclusion had this analysis been done in 1989? Not so. It would just favor the clubs that had stellar seasons from 1986-1988, such as the Bears, Giants, or Browns. I don't think any of them were at the top of Mr. Fortenbaugh's 2009-2011 analysis. You need more history than just 3 years to make a claim about home field advantage.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 194 (members: 1, guests: 193)