Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 923611" data-attributes="member: 7261">First, I don't care whether it was Rodgers idea or Gute's idea, the WR group was improved with the addition of Cobb and really for the price, name another Free Agent that you would have rather signed at WR.Also, I still am not looking at just the 1 game.  Remember, while Cobb established great chemistry with Rodgers before leaving in Free Agency, that was in Mike McCarthy's offense.  This is a brand new offense and I imagine it took some time for him to absorb it all.  He has never looked lost or dropped easy passes.  Both his catch % and yards/catch are really good. I actually think MVS's injury may turn out to be a blessing in disguise for the Packers.  Yes, the long passes, when completed are awesome, but MVS has 76 yards on 6 catches and 16 targets, that isn't a great % and only 4.75 yds/attempt. 47 of those 76 yards are on 1 catch. For comparison here are the other targets yds/tgt:- Cobb: 11.55 yds/tgt- Lazard: 11.38- A. Jones: 9- Davante: 8.28- Tonyan: 4.9- MVS: 4.75Without MVS on the field, they may lose an occasional home run, but AR might also complete more short passes and first downs.  I think MVS has a role in the offense, but it has to go beyond being just a 1 trick pony.</blockquote>

Total: 1,147 (members: 2, guests: 1,145)