Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 732203" data-attributes="member: 7261">What NFL player isn't "MASSIVELY" overpaid?  But that is another debate.  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />I think most everyone, probably even Cobb himself, knows that his contract isn't meeting his numbers, but you have to ask yourself...."Who do you replace him with and how much will that cost you?"  If that guy you replace him with turns out to be a bust, was it worth the savings?  I am in full agreement that Cobb is being overpaid, but that is an obvious fact, but I don't think it's as "Massive" as some think.  If the Packers had a replacement and were 100% confident that they don't lose much in performance, versaitlity, field and locker room presence, then he is expendable.  At this point, overpaying him seems to be the most logical option.  Much like CMIII, the Packers know what they have and don't currently have a better replacement.What happens when, god forbid, AR's play starts declining, but he is still the best option on the team?  Do you say "He is being overpaid, get rid of him"?  Or do you accept that he is your best option and take the hit?</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,073 (members: 1, guests: 1,072)