Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Randall benched.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Un4GivN" data-source="post: 695544" data-attributes="member: 8782"><p>There is always this over-reaction to things. Week 1 he was being praised as gods gift to the Packers at corner. He gets a significant groin injury and misses some time, and the flood gates open. I am not sure I have ever seen a secondary as bad as the Packers without Rollins and Randall. It was depressing.</p><p></p><p>My view is Randall might not be a number 1. But I am not closing the book on a guy who was forced back to stop the bleeding and save a year for the Packers. There is no doubt in my mind without Randall and Rollins we don't win 4 straight. The Packers were historically bad without him and Rollins. Allowing 30+ in all games he missed except 1</p><p></p><p>Just to give a little stat... The Packers are 6-1 with Randall in allowing 20.85 ppg. (Note he only played 17 of 64 snaps against Dallas and still obviously injured).</p><p></p><p>Without him they are 2-5. Allowing 27.57 ppg.</p><p></p><p>Now of course he isn't the sole reason we lost those game, nor is he the sole reason we won while he was in (AR has been on fire, turnover ratio is waaay up just to name a few.) But I still believe, even if injured the Packers are better with him in than out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Un4GivN, post: 695544, member: 8782"] There is always this over-reaction to things. Week 1 he was being praised as gods gift to the Packers at corner. He gets a significant groin injury and misses some time, and the flood gates open. I am not sure I have ever seen a secondary as bad as the Packers without Rollins and Randall. It was depressing. My view is Randall might not be a number 1. But I am not closing the book on a guy who was forced back to stop the bleeding and save a year for the Packers. There is no doubt in my mind without Randall and Rollins we don't win 4 straight. The Packers were historically bad without him and Rollins. Allowing 30+ in all games he missed except 1 Just to give a little stat... The Packers are 6-1 with Randall in allowing 20.85 ppg. (Note he only played 17 of 64 snaps against Dallas and still obviously injured). Without him they are 2-5. Allowing 27.57 ppg. Now of course he isn't the sole reason we lost those game, nor is he the sole reason we won while he was in (AR has been on fire, turnover ratio is waaay up just to name a few.) But I still believe, even if injured the Packers are better with him in than out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
scheeler
PikeBadger
Heyjoe4
Calebs Revenge
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
H
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: Heyjoe4
4 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
Packers Hire New Defensive Coordinator: Jeff Hafley, formerly Head Coach, Boston College
Latest: Heyjoe4
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
I had This Nightmare
Latest: rmontro
46 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:15 AM
All Other Sports
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Randall benched.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top