Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Quarterback Exemption for NFL Salary Cap?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 777490" data-attributes="member: 10441"><p>It is tough to develop that way. I'd like there to be some sort of expansion of the PS type rosters and exemptions to CBA restrictions on practices for them. It would increase workloads on staff and coaches that's for certain, but I think a lot of coaches would like that to a degree. a couple extra weeks with project guys and get a region together for a day of scrimmages, which are just glorified practices, situational football etc. Then you don't have to field entire developmental teams. I don't think there are enough guys being missed from college that entire teams would be supported and I'd rather project guys stay in our system and not some generic football system mashed together with players from all other teams. Just on our own team, Cullen Jenkins and Bill Schroeder really developed in a supplemental league and took some time to latch on. I'd like to see more of that, but I'd like it to be more in house development with expanded practices for those guys with our coaches. </p><p></p><p>There would be details to work out with that otherwise you'd just have teams building huge PS rosters and guys who could play will get stashed and brought up later. If they leave all PS guys open for poaching, then good luck developing. I think there would have to be some sort of protections on kept players, but also has to be a restriction then on when they could be called up. They're going to want to keep rosters competitive like now, so having an increased PS roster, some of those guys would have to be designated to be called up to regular roster with restrictions on when or how. They aren't just going to protect another 20 guys or so from other teams and then allow them to be called up at any time. They may as well just increase roster sizes period then. Has to be some trade off.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mondio, post: 777490, member: 10441"] It is tough to develop that way. I'd like there to be some sort of expansion of the PS type rosters and exemptions to CBA restrictions on practices for them. It would increase workloads on staff and coaches that's for certain, but I think a lot of coaches would like that to a degree. a couple extra weeks with project guys and get a region together for a day of scrimmages, which are just glorified practices, situational football etc. Then you don't have to field entire developmental teams. I don't think there are enough guys being missed from college that entire teams would be supported and I'd rather project guys stay in our system and not some generic football system mashed together with players from all other teams. Just on our own team, Cullen Jenkins and Bill Schroeder really developed in a supplemental league and took some time to latch on. I'd like to see more of that, but I'd like it to be more in house development with expanded practices for those guys with our coaches. There would be details to work out with that otherwise you'd just have teams building huge PS rosters and guys who could play will get stashed and brought up later. If they leave all PS guys open for poaching, then good luck developing. I think there would have to be some sort of protections on kept players, but also has to be a restriction then on when they could be called up. They're going to want to keep rosters competitive like now, so having an increased PS roster, some of those guys would have to be designated to be called up to regular roster with restrictions on when or how. They aren't just going to protect another 20 guys or so from other teams and then allow them to be called up at any time. They may as well just increase roster sizes period then. Has to be some trade off. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
48 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
The Indiana Bears?
Latest: milani
Today at 4:00 PM
NFL Discussions
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 3:31 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 2:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Quarterback Exemption for NFL Salary Cap?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top