Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 965527" data-attributes="member: 10086">While that argument may be absolutely true in a funnel, the Packers have quietly used resources from Offense and reapplied them to other areas. Imo. The Packers don’t need to produce Davante Production. They need only come in that general neighborhood (3800+) and the exchange is a Win. I’ll take 300 yards receiving for a top 3 type Defense. Especially an Offense that can run the ball well in January.While everyone was circling (and still is) like vultures focusing on our WR1, we quietly retained every last D starter and went and added 2 of the Georgia Bulldogs’ top several defenders. This is the best D talent group since 2010 and possibly better overall.  I think they already know it too and that makes them more dangerous. We won’t need Davante, he was a nice luxury, but he wasn’t going to take us over the top, unless he had a 1800yard-20TD type season etc..  He’d have to surpass 1995 Jerry Rice numbers to justify keeping him at $30M and giving up a #22,#53Also one point people forget about eggs in a basket.  if he injured? You’re doomed</blockquote>

Total: 253 (members: 2, guests: 251)