Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 965017" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Yes I considered this. That’s why he’d have to come relatively cheap and as I said earlier, check out physically.</p><p>Bulaga or not, We should definitely be knee deep on a Veteran option if he’s not our guy.</p><p>Come to think of it. So far I’ve heard of no good specific alternatives to running with a relatively new, inexperienced group. I’ve learned that doing nothing and expecting zero future injuries of our own, that makes kicking the tires on a questionable backup plan look like brilliance. If Nijman goes down and Bak isn’t ready, what’s our O lineup look like again?? Not good. How about 2 guys injure? Or how about 4 guys domino, are we prepared?</p><p></p><p> In finality, imo doing nothing or waiting it out is a terrible response to our OL situation. We need options on the table and we need those options yesterday. But I’m beginning to sympathize with how Abe Lincoln felt with the Complacency of Gen “Little Mac” McClellan’s staying stagnant and arguing a million reasons why not to advance at the most pivotal point of the campaign. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/thumbsdown.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":tdown:" title="Thumbs Down :tdown:" data-shortname=":tdown:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 965017, member: 10086"] Yes I considered this. That’s why he’d have to come relatively cheap and as I said earlier, check out physically. Bulaga or not, We should definitely be knee deep on a Veteran option if he’s not our guy. Come to think of it. So far I’ve heard of no good specific alternatives to running with a relatively new, inexperienced group. I’ve learned that doing nothing and expecting zero future injuries of our own, that makes kicking the tires on a questionable backup plan look like brilliance. If Nijman goes down and Bak isn’t ready, what’s our O lineup look like again?? Not good. How about 2 guys injure? Or how about 4 guys domino, are we prepared? In finality, imo doing nothing or waiting it out is a terrible response to our OL situation. We need options on the table and we need those options yesterday. But I’m beginning to sympathize with how Abe Lincoln felt with the Complacency of Gen “Little Mac” McClellan’s staying stagnant and arguing a million reasons why not to advance at the most pivotal point of the campaign. :tdown: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
G
griffin
Administrator
Members online
rmontro
griffin
Latest posts
R
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: rmontro
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Trade Candidates
Latest: tynimiller
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
UDFA Signings 2025
Latest: gopkrs
57 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 4:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:25 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top