Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 964594" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Yes.</p><p></p><p>I’d be willing to wager that the Packers are at or very near the bottom of NFL teams in total capital spent at the position. If we added TE? It would just double down on thin.</p><p>I remember a couple seasons ago scanning the Patriots Drafts, because someone has mentioned they did the same thing. But upon looking at the full spectrum, they had multiple Day1 picked WR’s added through FA. It’s a different approach, but they still heavily stocked Brady.</p><p></p><p>Green Bay can’t really say that. In Rodgers tenure he’s had very few resources thrown his direction as far as Receiver-TE.</p><p></p><p> The point I think I’m trying to make? is that Aaron Rodgers (and good coaching) have taken one of the (if not the) worst level of resources and molded them into top 10 units on a regular basis. I don’t have time to do further research, but I’d wager regularly bottom 10 types resources turning top 10 type results. It’s really a testament to him. It’s my opinion those conditions made him stronger as a QB. It’s also why I’m not jumping off a bridge, this 2022 is just his usual stroll in the park for Aaron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 964594, member: 10086"] Yes. I’d be willing to wager that the Packers are at or very near the bottom of NFL teams in total capital spent at the position. If we added TE? It would just double down on thin. I remember a couple seasons ago scanning the Patriots Drafts, because someone has mentioned they did the same thing. But upon looking at the full spectrum, they had multiple Day1 picked WR’s added through FA. It’s a different approach, but they still heavily stocked Brady. Green Bay can’t really say that. In Rodgers tenure he’s had very few resources thrown his direction as far as Receiver-TE. The point I think I’m trying to make? is that Aaron Rodgers (and good coaching) have taken one of the (if not the) worst level of resources and molded them into top 10 units on a regular basis. I don’t have time to do further research, but I’d wager regularly bottom 10 types resources turning top 10 type results. It’s really a testament to him. It’s my opinion those conditions made him stronger as a QB. It’s also why I’m not jumping off a bridge, this 2022 is just his usual stroll in the park for Aaron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Don Barclay
tynimiller
RepStar15
weeds
Latest posts
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: tynimiller
45 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: tynimiller
51 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: DoURant
Today at 2:03 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Draft Gambling
Latest: sschind
Today at 1:40 PM
Draft Talk
S
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: sschind
Today at 1:32 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top