Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 964289" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I disagree.</p><p></p><p>Lazard in a good sample size has shown proficient. With a larger sample size I could see perform well into that WR2 role (750+). Playoff experience</p><p></p><p>Cobb is older, but if given more looks could easily surpass that lower WR2 level (750+). Playoff experience</p><p></p><p>Sammy has dealt with injuries, but has proven when on the field hes formidable. As long as he plays</p><p>10-12 of 17 games he’s an easy pick of this group to our veteran leader. There was a reason KC hired him, the only nick he has is availability, that doesn’t fit your “unproven” remark at all. He’s had multiple seasons as what I’d call a WR2+ lower WR1- area. Over 1,000 yards.</p><p>Playoff experience</p><p></p><p>Watson is a complete unknown, yes. ALL Rookies are. Yet he is one of this drafts higher prospects and he’s paired with yours truly.. #12. Every season has rookies and if paired with a great QB, they tend to perform far better. You can’t get a better scenario for Watson. He’s an unknown, but his bigger issue is recent surgery. He’s an easy projected WR3 if he’s on that field. With potential of a WR2 numbers early on. Much due to a highly unusual WR room, as you said.</p><p>College playoff champion</p><p></p><p>Captain, we are nowhere near as bad as you have us in receiving.</p><p> Is there a ?? On who will be the riser? absolutely. If you are insinuating that we will highly underperform in our receiving room compared with the league, you will be wrong this January. For a guy that touts his QB so highly, you sure seem to highly underestimate what he can do with a room full of potential.</p><p></p><p>As far yards. We don’t need yards. We need Wins. That’s all that matters. We don’t need to be a #1 Offense anymore. How had that ended recently?? Not good</p><p></p><p>We need a better formula. We need a gritty Defense, ST that can hold their own +, top with an Offense that is proficient and can shut people up and then can Run the ball well in January- February. The days of a #1 Offense. #22 Defense and #28 ST are gone. There’s a new Sheriff in Town and he’s Won more games than basically any HC in history! If you think Davante Adams was the Nucleus of 39 Wins you are greatly mistaken. You act like we are a dysfunctional franchise and you’re like a pitbull on losing Adams. There was life before Adams and how many Super Bowl Rings does he have?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 964289, member: 10086"] I disagree. Lazard in a good sample size has shown proficient. With a larger sample size I could see perform well into that WR2 role (750+). Playoff experience Cobb is older, but if given more looks could easily surpass that lower WR2 level (750+). Playoff experience Sammy has dealt with injuries, but has proven when on the field hes formidable. As long as he plays 10-12 of 17 games he’s an easy pick of this group to our veteran leader. There was a reason KC hired him, the only nick he has is availability, that doesn’t fit your “unproven” remark at all. He’s had multiple seasons as what I’d call a WR2+ lower WR1- area. Over 1,000 yards. Playoff experience Watson is a complete unknown, yes. ALL Rookies are. Yet he is one of this drafts higher prospects and he’s paired with yours truly.. #12. Every season has rookies and if paired with a great QB, they tend to perform far better. You can’t get a better scenario for Watson. He’s an unknown, but his bigger issue is recent surgery. He’s an easy projected WR3 if he’s on that field. With potential of a WR2 numbers early on. Much due to a highly unusual WR room, as you said. College playoff champion Captain, we are nowhere near as bad as you have us in receiving. Is there a ?? On who will be the riser? absolutely. If you are insinuating that we will highly underperform in our receiving room compared with the league, you will be wrong this January. For a guy that touts his QB so highly, you sure seem to highly underestimate what he can do with a room full of potential. As far yards. We don’t need yards. We need Wins. That’s all that matters. We don’t need to be a #1 Offense anymore. How had that ended recently?? Not good We need a better formula. We need a gritty Defense, ST that can hold their own +, top with an Offense that is proficient and can shut people up and then can Run the ball well in January- February. The days of a #1 Offense. #22 Defense and #28 ST are gone. There’s a new Sheriff in Town and he’s Won more games than basically any HC in history! If you think Davante Adams was the Nucleus of 39 Wins you are greatly mistaken. You act like we are a dysfunctional franchise and you’re like a pitbull on losing Adams. There was life before Adams and how many Super Bowl Rings does he have? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Catamount1971
DoURant
gopkrs
scheeler
Latest posts
games in Iowa - Newbie (be gentle, LOL)
Latest: lancer84
Today at 7:38 PM
Introduce Yourself
My double secret probation final mock draft
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 7:34 PM
Draft Talk
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:43 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:41 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:38 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting the Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top