Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 964204" data-attributes="member: 10086">True. I still think our potential in 2022 is more solid with these choices receivingSammy, Cobb, Watson, Lazard, Doubs, AmariBig Dog, Tonyan, DeguaraVS 2015JJ, Cobb, Adams,Janis, AbbredarisQuarless, Rodgers, PerilloIt’s just similar Crowd at the top, but with a much deeper WR potential in 2022. I’ve got 4 potential #2 types in 2022 vs 3 in the 2015 season.The TE group wins a tiebreaker imoIt’s a similar look, but I’d take this years 2022 TE group over that slow 2015 group That 2015 group was just ok+. 31TD, 8INT. 3,821 yards. I would argue that this group surpasses either 2015 category of TD’s or Yards or even possibly both.I’ll risk a guess hypothesis:37TD/8INT/4,010yds</blockquote>

Total: 990 (members: 3, guests: 987)