Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting 2015 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 616695"><p>I wasn't interested enough to try to find out how they defined +/- in 2010.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps there are several dubious propositions that go into it, like this one:</p><p></p><p>"Meanwhile, a 16-yard gain on third-and-20 is also a failed completion, but if the receiver catches the ball 10 yards down the right sideline and then gains 6 YAC, on average that's going to be a more impressive play on his part. Both receivers helped their catch rate and gained the same amount of YAC, but the second receiver overcame more difficult circumstances to produce his play."</p><p></p><p>Besides, if getting a first down distinguishes "failed" from "successful" completions, why isn't Cobb in the top 10?</p><p></p><p>It all strikes me as too clever by half.</p><p></p><p>We do know this: "The next-to-last column, C%+, is the player's plus-minus divided by the targets." Therefore, Kenny Stills and Brandin Cooks are the finest wide receivers in all the land on a per target basis, doncha know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 616695"] I wasn't interested enough to try to find out how they defined +/- in 2010. Perhaps there are several dubious propositions that go into it, like this one: "Meanwhile, a 16-yard gain on third-and-20 is also a failed completion, but if the receiver catches the ball 10 yards down the right sideline and then gains 6 YAC, on average that's going to be a more impressive play on his part. Both receivers helped their catch rate and gained the same amount of YAC, but the second receiver overcame more difficult circumstances to produce his play." Besides, if getting a first down distinguishes "failed" from "successful" completions, why isn't Cobb in the top 10? It all strikes me as too clever by half. We do know this: "The next-to-last column, C%+, is the player's plus-minus divided by the targets." Therefore, Kenny Stills and Brandin Cooks are the finest wide receivers in all the land on a per target basis, doncha know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
gopkrs
Latest posts
Badger Volleyball 2025-26
Latest: Voyageur
7 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
R
Is it time?
Latest: rmontro
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Time for Rules Changes
Latest: Half Empty
Today at 4:30 PM
Introduce Yourself
Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block
Latest: DoURant
Today at 4:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:19 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Projecting 2015 season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top