Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prioritizing Needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 994508" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Well there’s only maybe a few Safeties I would feel comfortable starting week 1 and they’ll be gone in that top 100 players area. So for myself, much of the solution to that dilemma depends on our trade deal with NY and that’s why this trade that some are making light of is no joke (not saying you says that)</p><p></p><p>If we let Rodgers go drastically under trade value? we’ll be needing more than just a Safety, we’ll Have plenty of vacancies in our FO also and expect 3+ years of wandering in the desert. The next 2 Drafts will define Brian’s Time in GB.</p><p></p><p>Now I don’t think Brian is flaky or anything finding talent, but he needs significant draft resources to do his job or he’ll soon be under serious scrutiny from fans just like yourself and I might join in!</p><p></p><p>Lastly, I’ll sound like a broken record but for good reason. TWO earlier 2nd Rounders from NY (or equivalent) is the minimum we can take unless we get a Day 1 this season OR next to give us a fighting chance. I’ll leave it to the experts to hash that out, but that’s my novice opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 994508, member: 10086"] Well there’s only maybe a few Safeties I would feel comfortable starting week 1 and they’ll be gone in that top 100 players area. So for myself, much of the solution to that dilemma depends on our trade deal with NY and that’s why this trade that some are making light of is no joke (not saying you says that) If we let Rodgers go drastically under trade value? we’ll be needing more than just a Safety, we’ll Have plenty of vacancies in our FO also and expect 3+ years of wandering in the desert. The next 2 Drafts will define Brian’s Time in GB. Now I don’t think Brian is flaky or anything finding talent, but he needs significant draft resources to do his job or he’ll soon be under serious scrutiny from fans just like yourself and I might join in! Lastly, I’ll sound like a broken record but for good reason. TWO earlier 2nd Rounders from NY (or equivalent) is the minimum we can take unless we get a Day 1 this season OR next to give us a fighting chance. I’ll leave it to the experts to hash that out, but that’s my novice opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
weeds
Latest posts
H
Is it time?
Latest: Heyjoe4
18 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 2:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:40 PM
Draft Talk
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 12:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Prioritizing Needs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top