Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Possible wr trade targets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Do7" data-source="post: 866029" data-attributes="member: 13398"><p>Still sounds like a crutch if you ask me. What team is fully healthy throughout the course of the season? While we're at it, please explain to me what guarantee would there have been for KC and Minnesota to have beaten us had those two played, both of whom were injured, and we certainly would've heard that used as an excuse had we had won. Let alone the fact that they had HFA, and had better overall talent. KC offensively anyways, and Minnesota, overall. </p><p></p><p>Lastly I love how you are completely negating the fact that our defense couldn't force a 3 and out, thus putting the offense in a bind, and how everyone outside of Adams didn't show up offensively. But somehow we lost this game because of Rodgers, even though we HAD a chance to comeback if the defense was able to force a 3 and out and they couldn't do that to save their lives. By your logic we lost this game because of Rodgers, and that is completely idiotic. EVERYONE gets blame for that game.</p><p></p><p>As for the ranked 14th? It's weird because I recall going into the season, experts were saying how The Packers had one of the toughest schedules, and yet we do better than expected and somehow our schedule is weaker. Well tell me something exactly, other than NO and us who did SF beat? Who did NO beat that was impressive? My point being is that we're in the business where the concept is winning. It doesn't HOW we win, just as long as we're able to.</p><p></p><p>So yes in hindsight, we certainly overachieved, and whether you like it or not, we WERE one game away from getting to The Superbowl, and the fact that you're suggesting we basically blow things up and rebuild is baffling to me. Matter of fact, I bet you the game would've probably been more competitive had we got the 1 seed as we have proven to be a better home team than we are on the road. Let alone on the west coast.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Do7, post: 866029, member: 13398"] Still sounds like a crutch if you ask me. What team is fully healthy throughout the course of the season? While we're at it, please explain to me what guarantee would there have been for KC and Minnesota to have beaten us had those two played, both of whom were injured, and we certainly would've heard that used as an excuse had we had won. Let alone the fact that they had HFA, and had better overall talent. KC offensively anyways, and Minnesota, overall. Lastly I love how you are completely negating the fact that our defense couldn't force a 3 and out, thus putting the offense in a bind, and how everyone outside of Adams didn't show up offensively. But somehow we lost this game because of Rodgers, even though we HAD a chance to comeback if the defense was able to force a 3 and out and they couldn't do that to save their lives. By your logic we lost this game because of Rodgers, and that is completely idiotic. EVERYONE gets blame for that game. As for the ranked 14th? It's weird because I recall going into the season, experts were saying how The Packers had one of the toughest schedules, and yet we do better than expected and somehow our schedule is weaker. Well tell me something exactly, other than NO and us who did SF beat? Who did NO beat that was impressive? My point being is that we're in the business where the concept is winning. It doesn't HOW we win, just as long as we're able to. So yes in hindsight, we certainly overachieved, and whether you like it or not, we WERE one game away from getting to The Superbowl, and the fact that you're suggesting we basically blow things up and rebuild is baffling to me. Matter of fact, I bet you the game would've probably been more competitive had we got the 1 seed as we have proven to be a better home team than we are on the road. Let alone on the west coast. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
shockerx
Packermudgeon
ExpatPacker
PikeBadger
Latest posts
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
19 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
29 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: PikeBadger
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pkrjones
47 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Possible wr trade targets?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top