Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Please stop saying, "It is hard to beat a team 3 times in a season"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackerfaninCarolina" data-source="post: 860058" data-attributes="member: 9364"><p>Well, I will just say by now that the thread's original point it is moot because the Vikes obviously didn't uphold their end of the bargain. But I'd say that's in part the problem there. There's a reason why they went 10-6 and we went 13-3. Are there a few instances where a team got swept in the regular season only to beat the sweepers a third time? Sure, but there's a reason it doesn't happen that often.</p><p></p><p>I suppose the argument could have been made that had they beaten SF the other day, we'd be dealing with a hot team that got healthy and confident that we didn't want to face. But even still that may not necessarily have been the case had SF just self imploded and the Vikes managed to stay turnover free.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, as moot as it is, I don't see the result of a would have been third meeting playing out any different than the first two, just as it's stupid and ridiculous to think the Packers got an easier matchup against the Seahawks than they would have had against the Saints or Eagles. Ridiculous and made up of debunked points that were put on full display on national television last week.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackerfaninCarolina, post: 860058, member: 9364"] Well, I will just say by now that the thread's original point it is moot because the Vikes obviously didn't uphold their end of the bargain. But I'd say that's in part the problem there. There's a reason why they went 10-6 and we went 13-3. Are there a few instances where a team got swept in the regular season only to beat the sweepers a third time? Sure, but there's a reason it doesn't happen that often. I suppose the argument could have been made that had they beaten SF the other day, we'd be dealing with a hot team that got healthy and confident that we didn't want to face. But even still that may not necessarily have been the case had SF just self imploded and the Vikes managed to stay turnover free. Bottom line, as moot as it is, I don't see the result of a would have been third meeting playing out any different than the first two, just as it's stupid and ridiculous to think the Packers got an easier matchup against the Seahawks than they would have had against the Saints or Eagles. Ridiculous and made up of debunked points that were put on full display on national television last week. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
G
Free Agency Thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
40 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 9:30 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Who Will Start?
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 8:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What's life really like in Green Bay?
Latest: King of Jeans
Today at 4:51 PM
The Green Bay Life
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Please stop saying, "It is hard to beat a team 3 times in a season"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top