Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 910244" data-attributes="member: 10086">If you get some free time, look up the veteran FA signings made by the Patriots during Brady’s tenure. Then take that list and concentrate on the WR group and where they were drafted (think of it as adding the comprehensive value of the points together based on draft order) I’m assuming you know GB already and the capital they spent at WR over Rodgers tenure.You likely never considered the full spectrum approach of WR acquisition when comparing both teams by using both draft + FA. The Patriots used a draft n develop strategy sparingly at WR, whereas GB was wholly draft n develop to a fault.What you said was partially correct, but just consider it only tells about 1/3 of the full story of how the Patriots went after veteran help almost every season. Some of the best WR in the last 20 seasons went through NE at some juncture.That NE Pats list makes the Packers list look like we were trying to aggravate Aaron Rodgers on purpose. That’s how egregious the FA + draft resources spent at the WR group have been in GB since Rodgers started (in comparison with NE)</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 621 (members: 0, guests: 621)