Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pff annual top 50 list...how many packers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 878065"><p>Brady has always had accuracy issues with that 63.0 career completion percentage. Worse, there have been all those short throws to slots, TEs and RBs over the past decade as evidenced by his weak career 7.0 yds. per attempt. He should have been posting 70+% seasons like Brees in recent years. And those weak Division opponents--a grand total of four 10 win seasons over the last decade against fourteen 10 loss seasons. </p><p></p><p>This past season produced some especially weak Brady stats with his 2nd. ranked receiver being a running back without a close third out of the WR position, but as we know that's no excuse. Never mind that the Pats finished 13-3. They lost in the wild card round and that's the only thing that matters in evaluating QB performance.</p><p></p><p>Brady's 2019 resembles his dismal 2006 season where his top receiver was the recently murdered Reche Caldwell. 12-4, lost in the Conference Championship. Randy Moss shows up in 2007 with both players having seasons for the ages, while Welker has his breakout season. 16-0, lost in the Super Bowl. That reminds me of a certain 15-1 team with a very good group of receiving weapons.</p><p></p><p>If one wants to go by winning games despite less than stellar stats, which is the Brady carreer in the aggregate, with the GOAT designation the product of championships, not stats however you measure them, where the greatest coach since Lombardi has a little something to do with that, then there you have it. Last I checked, the Packers have not had a defensive genius who could change his defensive scheme from one playoff game to the next after crusing through a weak division every year.</p><p></p><p>You know, going 13-3 with a rookie head coach with a new system and only two offensive weapons to speak of, one of which missed 4 games, winning by smoke and mirrors as some would have it, it seems that some want to bite the hand that feeds them. Rodgers does belong in the top 50 just as Brady's stats have lying for nearly all of the last two decades.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure I'll get some replies that miss the point, but that's OK and not all that unusual.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 878065"] Brady has always had accuracy issues with that 63.0 career completion percentage. Worse, there have been all those short throws to slots, TEs and RBs over the past decade as evidenced by his weak career 7.0 yds. per attempt. He should have been posting 70+% seasons like Brees in recent years. And those weak Division opponents--a grand total of four 10 win seasons over the last decade against fourteen 10 loss seasons. This past season produced some especially weak Brady stats with his 2nd. ranked receiver being a running back without a close third out of the WR position, but as we know that's no excuse. Never mind that the Pats finished 13-3. They lost in the wild card round and that's the only thing that matters in evaluating QB performance. Brady's 2019 resembles his dismal 2006 season where his top receiver was the recently murdered Reche Caldwell. 12-4, lost in the Conference Championship. Randy Moss shows up in 2007 with both players having seasons for the ages, while Welker has his breakout season. 16-0, lost in the Super Bowl. That reminds me of a certain 15-1 team with a very good group of receiving weapons. If one wants to go by winning games despite less than stellar stats, which is the Brady carreer in the aggregate, with the GOAT designation the product of championships, not stats however you measure them, where the greatest coach since Lombardi has a little something to do with that, then there you have it. Last I checked, the Packers have not had a defensive genius who could change his defensive scheme from one playoff game to the next after crusing through a weak division every year. You know, going 13-3 with a rookie head coach with a new system and only two offensive weapons to speak of, one of which missed 4 games, winning by smoke and mirrors as some would have it, it seems that some want to bite the hand that feeds them. Rodgers does belong in the top 50 just as Brady's stats have lying for nearly all of the last two decades. I'm sure I'll get some replies that miss the point, but that's OK and not all that unusual. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pff annual top 50 list...how many packers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
