Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="johnny_blood" data-source="post: 231060" data-attributes="member: 913">Another detriment you have to admit is that time was spent developing the offense to feature Rodgers' peculiar talents.  That is a cost, but I think the costs altogether are more than offset by Favre being the superior QB.  Players are more important than offseason scheming.As for Favre playing poorly in the cold, almost everyone else on the team also played poorly in the two cold games last year.  Favre brought the team back from three deficits in their coldest game, a game in which the team was not good and we went back to having no running game.  I was at the Soldier Field game until the bitter end, and Favre was not the only one blowing it out there.  If Favre wants to play, I want him starting for us because he gives us the best chance to win, which offsets all the sunk costs incurred during his "retirement."If not then I think Rodgers will have a very nice season, and will be very crafty and smart for a first year starter.  Get on board or shut your mouth!</blockquote>

Total: 939 (members: 2, guests: 937)