Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King's take on all of this
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedSoxExcel" data-source="post: 231059" data-attributes="member: 748"><p>Can you please explain this detrimental comment. I'm honestly curious as to what that means. What makes you such an expert and so certain of that result? And if I missed something in a previous post, I'm sorry, I have not read all your posts and I'm sorry in advance if you have to type up your stance again. </p><p></p><p>If the Packers don't want him (which right now seems like they don't - but who knows), and they release or trade him in the next few weeks, how is that detrimental to the team? And please don't use the "distraction" excuse, see Giants 2007-08 and Pats 2007-08, if your a good team you overcome that. </p><p></p><p>If the Packers do want him, that means the management chose to keep him in which case, if your a Packers fan, you cheer for the Packers AND Favre just like I am going to cheer for the Packers AND Rodgers if we choose to release or trade him (assuming he comes back). It's up to TT, not you or me. </p><p></p><p>I don't get how this is a distraction. And please don't bring up that draft argument again because neither you nor me know what TT was thinking when he picked Flynn and who he would have selected if Favre had returned earlier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedSoxExcel, post: 231059, member: 748"] Can you please explain this detrimental comment. I'm honestly curious as to what that means. What makes you such an expert and so certain of that result? And if I missed something in a previous post, I'm sorry, I have not read all your posts and I'm sorry in advance if you have to type up your stance again. If the Packers don't want him (which right now seems like they don't - but who knows), and they release or trade him in the next few weeks, how is that detrimental to the team? And please don't use the "distraction" excuse, see Giants 2007-08 and Pats 2007-08, if your a good team you overcome that. If the Packers do want him, that means the management chose to keep him in which case, if your a Packers fan, you cheer for the Packers AND Favre just like I am going to cheer for the Packers AND Rodgers if we choose to release or trade him (assuming he comes back). It's up to TT, not you or me. I don't get how this is a distraction. And please don't bring up that draft argument again because neither you nor me know what TT was thinking when he picked Flynn and who he would have selected if Favre had returned earlier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
DoURant
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: DoURant
5 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 2:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 2:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Peter King's take on all of this
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top