Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 660433" data-attributes="member: 9780">A player of his stature, who is a dual threat would be a perfect prospect to develope behind a veteran. I read he has good accuracy down field on the run. Sort of conflicts with the idea that he is only 49% from outside the numbers... But if i had a choice. I would take accuracy on the run down field, over accuracy on short to intermediate , high velocity throws... Seems the short throws could be fixed with a little coaching. Where as the deep throw accuracy on the run is more of a difficult quality to find in a rookie QB...The size though. He will be hard to bring down. Plus ability to scramble... He could be special.If I was a GM looking for a QB. I go after him. Every QB is a project. But this one has inherent advantages to build on... And if i think he is the one, I dont wait and hope he slips to me in the 2nd... Speculating a crumby team picking near the top of the second will be looking at him more than the teams who already have a good QB... Putting myself in the position of a GM needing a QB and wanting this one... I trade up and over pay one perspective. But gain the QB of the future, which is a huge win!early 2nd and 3rd rounder for #27? It would make for a very lame day 1, and a great day 2 and early day 3 with 3 4th rounders...</blockquote>

Total: 75 (members: 1, guests: 74)