Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rush in 2017
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 723235" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>Whether he is an ILB or an OLB, my question/issue with Clay is that it is very hard to predict who you will have for 2017. I don't expect he will play up to his full contract value ($15.075 M), that is almost a given, but the Packers have to ask themselves, "will he play up to his contract over the dead cap hit ($10.6M) to warrant keeping him?" Cutting him saves the Packers $10.6 M....that is a lot of coin that could be used going forward. I'm still not sold that he is that great as an ILB (especially $10.6M great), he may have a better chance at getting a sack playing inside, but at what cost is the defense paying by getting an additional sack or two if Clay is vacating the other duties of an ILB? I think both Ryan and Martinez are on the uptick as ILB's and need to keep getting most of the snaps. If they want to stunt Clay inside on obvious pass plays fine, but if he is still on the team come September, barring an injury to Ryan or Martinez, I hope it is as an OLB. </p><p></p><p>The best solution is a restructuring of his contract, one that reflects his last few years production but provides incentives to Clay to earn back the amounts he was being paid as a top OLB in the NFL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 723235, member: 7261"] Whether he is an ILB or an OLB, my question/issue with Clay is that it is very hard to predict who you will have for 2017. I don't expect he will play up to his full contract value ($15.075 M), that is almost a given, but the Packers have to ask themselves, "will he play up to his contract over the dead cap hit ($10.6M) to warrant keeping him?" Cutting him saves the Packers $10.6 M....that is a lot of coin that could be used going forward. I'm still not sold that he is that great as an ILB (especially $10.6M great), he may have a better chance at getting a sack playing inside, but at what cost is the defense paying by getting an additional sack or two if Clay is vacating the other duties of an ILB? I think both Ryan and Martinez are on the uptick as ILB's and need to keep getting most of the snaps. If they want to stunt Clay inside on obvious pass plays fine, but if he is still on the team come September, barring an injury to Ryan or Martinez, I hope it is as an OLB. The best solution is a restructuring of his contract, one that reflects his last few years production but provides incentives to Clay to earn back the amounts he was being paid as a top OLB in the NFL. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
saturdaysarebetter
gopkrs
Latest posts
R
NFC North Predictions
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:54 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 12:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Packers Trade Candidates
Latest: Heyjoe4
Yesterday at 2:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Push to Ban the **** Push
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 1:03 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Da Bears new head coach!!!!!
Latest: weeds
Thursday at 7:27 PM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pass Rush in 2017
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top