Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Panthers: Rodgers CLEARED
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 752420"><p>You are correct in pointing out that game as a 350+ yard performance from Rodgers that I missed. So, make it 3-1 in the playoffs, 7-7 in regular season, 1-4 in the last 5 regular season games where Rodgers went 350+. Again, there is only one game in the Rodgers era with 350+ from the QB and 100+ from the running backs. Mistakes are the risk one takes in making time to do some work "by hand".</p><p></p><p>If there's another I missed, feel free to point it out:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RodgAa00/gamelog/" target="_blank">https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RodgAa00/gamelog/</a></p><p></p><p>In the game you cited, Starks, Jackson and Kuhn combined for 84 yards on 28 carries for a 3.0 average. You can throw in another 13 yards on two Rodgers runs if you like. In looking for a prolific and<strong><em> balanced </em></strong>attack which was the original point, this would not be it, and there are in fact not many instances in the Rodgers era.</p><p></p><p>If the score is what you're looking at, it should be noted that 7 of the Packer points in that game were on a 70 yard T-Will pick 6. Additionally, the Packers won the turnover battle 4-1 and took over once on a failed 4th. down conversion which is equivalent to a turnover.</p><p></p><p>In addition to the 4 (or 5 if one prefers) turnovers, the defense held to Atlanta 194 yards in the game, 3-10 on 3rd. down, 1-2 on 4th. down, forced 3 punts. Big help from the defense after the rocky start. That is not all that surprising since that was a very good defense, easily the best Capers has fielded in Green Bay. That pass D posted a 67.2 passer rating against that season compared to 98.2 this year, and was second in the league in sacks with 47, right up there with the Legion of Boom as the best of the last decade. </p><p></p><p>I don't think the offense will get that kind of help this week.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>Rodgers</em> </strong>was brilliant over about two quarters in the middle of the game, converting everything he needed to, in orchestrating the string of 4 long drives and then a 5th.. It may well have been <strong><em>his</em></strong> best game given the circumstances. I do not equate that to the <strong><em>offense's</em></strong> best game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 752420"] You are correct in pointing out that game as a 350+ yard performance from Rodgers that I missed. So, make it 3-1 in the playoffs, 7-7 in regular season, 1-4 in the last 5 regular season games where Rodgers went 350+. Again, there is only one game in the Rodgers era with 350+ from the QB and 100+ from the running backs. Mistakes are the risk one takes in making time to do some work "by hand". If there's another I missed, feel free to point it out: [URL]https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RodgAa00/gamelog/[/URL] In the game you cited, Starks, Jackson and Kuhn combined for 84 yards on 28 carries for a 3.0 average. You can throw in another 13 yards on two Rodgers runs if you like. In looking for a prolific and[B][I] balanced [/I][/B]attack which was the original point, this would not be it, and there are in fact not many instances in the Rodgers era. If the score is what you're looking at, it should be noted that 7 of the Packer points in that game were on a 70 yard T-Will pick 6. Additionally, the Packers won the turnover battle 4-1 and took over once on a failed 4th. down conversion which is equivalent to a turnover. In addition to the 4 (or 5 if one prefers) turnovers, the defense held to Atlanta 194 yards in the game, 3-10 on 3rd. down, 1-2 on 4th. down, forced 3 punts. Big help from the defense after the rocky start. That is not all that surprising since that was a very good defense, easily the best Capers has fielded in Green Bay. That pass D posted a 67.2 passer rating against that season compared to 98.2 this year, and was second in the league in sacks with 47, right up there with the Legion of Boom as the best of the last decade. I don't think the offense will get that kind of help this week. [B][I]Rodgers[/I] [/B]was brilliant over about two quarters in the middle of the game, converting everything he needed to, in orchestrating the string of 4 long drives and then a 5th.. It may well have been [B][I]his[/I][/B] best game given the circumstances. I do not equate that to the [B][I]offense's[/I][/B] best game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Panthers: Rodgers CLEARED
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
