Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Bears: S103,E1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1081812" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I agree. While I don’t want to spin in any way that losing Wyatt doesn’t hurt, it still is not losing our best player either.</p><p></p><p>Oddly I found out that Brinson has played more than I expected when looking at usage. He’s already been out there for 32% of the Defensive snaps over Stackhouses’ 15% count. That said they are somewhat different style players although both regular rotational from the Bulldogs class A Defense.</p><p>Warren Brinson is what I’d call a very balanced Run Stop vs Pass Rush player. He’s not dominant at either but Gus history does display above average at either. Stackhouse is more your Run Stop, gap eating, double block taking Beef who doesn’t give us as much in Pass Rush. Not meant to be any slight as they are different body types and players. Brinson at Georgia was closer to Wyatt (obviously not in Wyatt’s class coming into the NFL) as far as the style. Even at 6’5” 314lb he was seen on film chasing the play all the way into the Players bench. He hustles and is surprisingly quick using his stride and he offers some Pass rush proficiency.</p><p></p><p>For myself, and this is merely a guess, I see Stackhouse being more important in this game and should equal the snaps of Brinson (30%-35%). He’s going to eat multiple blocks and leave our ultra fast LB’s (and hard hitting Safeties) clean to take on Monongai etc. Now if it wasn’t 9 degrees out with 7mph wind? I’d probably flip and choose Brinson to bring an inside Pass obstacle. I think we’ll see Chicago use 60% Run in this one. They’ll want to use the template that Carolina used with their Run game. Eat the clock and move the chains and keep Love off the field.</p><p></p><p>PS. I’m well aware of the negative connotation that Hobbs has with some others (not you) in here. However imo Hobbs is near ideal in this type contest. The Bears use physicality and Hobbs one thing he does well is very similar to Bullard. He’s a very physical CB and not afraid to pop a RB into the dirt. He can’t be trusted as much in the Pass though, at least thus far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1081812, member: 10086"] I agree. While I don’t want to spin in any way that losing Wyatt doesn’t hurt, it still is not losing our best player either. Oddly I found out that Brinson has played more than I expected when looking at usage. He’s already been out there for 32% of the Defensive snaps over Stackhouses’ 15% count. That said they are somewhat different style players although both regular rotational from the Bulldogs class A Defense. Warren Brinson is what I’d call a very balanced Run Stop vs Pass Rush player. He’s not dominant at either but Gus history does display above average at either. Stackhouse is more your Run Stop, gap eating, double block taking Beef who doesn’t give us as much in Pass Rush. Not meant to be any slight as they are different body types and players. Brinson at Georgia was closer to Wyatt (obviously not in Wyatt’s class coming into the NFL) as far as the style. Even at 6’5” 314lb he was seen on film chasing the play all the way into the Players bench. He hustles and is surprisingly quick using his stride and he offers some Pass rush proficiency. For myself, and this is merely a guess, I see Stackhouse being more important in this game and should equal the snaps of Brinson (30%-35%). He’s going to eat multiple blocks and leave our ultra fast LB’s (and hard hitting Safeties) clean to take on Monongai etc. Now if it wasn’t 9 degrees out with 7mph wind? I’d probably flip and choose Brinson to bring an inside Pass obstacle. I think we’ll see Chicago use 60% Run in this one. They’ll want to use the template that Carolina used with their Run game. Eat the clock and move the chains and keep Love off the field. PS. I’m well aware of the negative connotation that Hobbs has with some others (not you) in here. However imo Hobbs is near ideal in this type contest. The Bears use physicality and Hobbs one thing he does well is very similar to Bullard. He’s a very physical CB and not afraid to pop a RB into the dirt. He can’t be trusted as much in the Pass though, at least thus far. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
tynimiller
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers vs Bears: S103,E1
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
