Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers trade Damarious Randall to Browns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 765420"><p>As I've mentioned repeatedly it would be smart to wait until at least after the draft to fairly evaluate the roster. It doesn't make any sense to analyze this trade in a vacuum though therefore the talent level remaining at cornerback has to be considered. That means losing Randall definitely isn't a plus by any means.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> Hundley is still on the roster. Stop acting as if you have been proven correct.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would have definitely felt way better if the Packers had improved the talent level at cornerback before trading Randall to the Browns as it's definitely not as easy as you suggested to replace a starter, even an average one like him. Gutekunst having to address the position after the team spent their first pick in the draft on it twice over the last three years should work as evidence for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 765420"] As I've mentioned repeatedly it would be smart to wait until at least after the draft to fairly evaluate the roster. It doesn't make any sense to analyze this trade in a vacuum though therefore the talent level remaining at cornerback has to be considered. That means losing Randall definitely isn't a plus by any means. :rolleyes: Hundley is still on the roster. Stop acting as if you have been proven correct. I would have definitely felt way better if the Packers had improved the talent level at cornerback before trading Randall to the Browns as it's definitely not as easy as you suggested to replace a starter, even an average one like him. Gutekunst having to address the position after the team spent their first pick in the draft on it twice over the last three years should work as evidence for it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
weeds
Latest posts
29th pick.. Eric stokes db
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 1:33 AM
Draft Talk
Who Will Start?
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 1:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Team Ronny
Yesterday at 10:25 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 9:48 PM
Draft Talk
Time to call Brett back from the woodshed....
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 7:11 PM
Brett Favre Discussion
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers trade Damarious Randall to Browns
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top