Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers ruin chance at one more run for glory . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greg C." data-source="post: 55823" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>The gregster agrees with others here that Ted Washington is getting up there in years, and we are better to go with the younger Pickett. </p><p></p><p>Gregster also questions why shoopster thinks that the Packers' poor track record with high draft picks has anything to do with this year's pick, considering that we have a different GM now. Furthermore, shoopster's conviction that the Packers will either "trade down or a draft a bust" strikes gregster as overly negative, considering that there is a third option out there, which is to actually draft a player who is good. </p><p></p><p>Gregster wonders why shoopster thinks a good defense should be built through the draft and a good offense should be built through free agency. Gregster thinks shoopster just pulled that one out of his rear end, and is wondering if shoopster has any examples to prove otherwise. </p><p></p><p>Hey, it's fun writing like this. Gregster thinks everybody in the forum should write like this from now on....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greg C., post: 55823, member: 195"] The gregster agrees with others here that Ted Washington is getting up there in years, and we are better to go with the younger Pickett. Gregster also questions why shoopster thinks that the Packers' poor track record with high draft picks has anything to do with this year's pick, considering that we have a different GM now. Furthermore, shoopster's conviction that the Packers will either "trade down or a draft a bust" strikes gregster as overly negative, considering that there is a third option out there, which is to actually draft a player who is good. Gregster wonders why shoopster thinks a good defense should be built through the draft and a good offense should be built through free agency. Gregster thinks shoopster just pulled that one out of his rear end, and is wondering if shoopster has any examples to prove otherwise. Hey, it's fun writing like this. Gregster thinks everybody in the forum should write like this from now on.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Firethorn1001
rmontro
Schultz
tynimiller
Curly Calhoun
Magooch
Latest posts
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Curly Calhoun
10 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Curly Calhoun
13 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: tynimiller
28 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 5:19 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers ruin chance at one more run for glory . . .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top