Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1065449" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I will say this though on Defense. I did not realize how good (to expectation) Carrington Valentine ranked last season. #45 out of 222 eligible CB’s with a 70.3% grade. (60.0 is the mean I believe)</p><p>Nixon had an ok + season also finishing with a 64.5% overall grade or #87/222. Although when we consider he flipped outside to replace JA? I think he played admirable. Ge also was exceptional at being disruptive.</p><p><strong>-#4</strong>/222 in Pass Rush grade (92.7%) which is Elite.</p><p>#166/222 in receptions yards per catch allowed (8.9 yards) but was impressive in Receptions allowed (56)</p><p>which ranked<strong> #10</strong>/222</p><p>-#32/222 in Pass Breakups.</p><p> I forgot Keisean’s natural position growing up was Outside CB, he says he never played Slot CB until coming to GB.</p><p></p><p>Nate Hobbs grades since his Rookie season (PFF)</p><p><strong>2021 81% grade</strong></p><p>2022 61% grade</p><p>2023 69% grade</p><p>2024 61% grade.</p><p>So he was average to good across a large sample. However what was impressive in 2024 was his<strong> 81% Run </strong>Defense grade.</p><p></p><p>So while our CB’s are not world beaters, they are either:</p><p>1. Early in their career</p><p>2. Switching positions</p><p>3. Very good graded in several individual categories, but around average graded overall.</p><p>4. Above average to pretty good compared to their peers leaguewide.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>As a comparative our Day 1 selection Stokes in 2024 graded average to below average. 61.3% or #112/222. However Eric’s best singular category #47/222 (tackle assists) he needed help! He was poor in Run Stop #183/222 or 50.8% grade which is well below average. We just got an upgrade just walking him imo. Stokes was near non existent in creating any explosive plays whatsoever. O Sacks, </p><p>0 INT, O passes Defenses, O Forced Fumbles 0 fumble recoveries.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1065449, member: 10086"] I will say this though on Defense. I did not realize how good (to expectation) Carrington Valentine ranked last season. #45 out of 222 eligible CB’s with a 70.3% grade. (60.0 is the mean I believe) Nixon had an ok + season also finishing with a 64.5% overall grade or #87/222. Although when we consider he flipped outside to replace JA? I think he played admirable. Ge also was exceptional at being disruptive. [B]-#4[/B]/222 in Pass Rush grade (92.7%) which is Elite. #166/222 in receptions yards per catch allowed (8.9 yards) but was impressive in Receptions allowed (56) which ranked[B] #10[/B]/222 -#32/222 in Pass Breakups. I forgot Keisean’s natural position growing up was Outside CB, he says he never played Slot CB until coming to GB. Nate Hobbs grades since his Rookie season (PFF) [B]2021 81% grade[/B] 2022 61% grade 2023 69% grade 2024 61% grade. So he was average to good across a large sample. However what was impressive in 2024 was his[B] 81% Run [/B]Defense grade. So while our CB’s are not world beaters, they are either: 1. Early in their career 2. Switching positions 3. Very good graded in several individual categories, but around average graded overall. 4. Above average to pretty good compared to their peers leaguewide. As a comparative our Day 1 selection Stokes in 2024 graded average to below average. 61.3% or #112/222. However Eric’s best singular category #47/222 (tackle assists) he needed help! He was poor in Run Stop #183/222 or 50.8% grade which is well below average. We just got an upgrade just walking him imo. Stokes was near non existent in creating any explosive plays whatsoever. O Sacks, 0 INT, O passes Defenses, O Forced Fumbles 0 fumble recoveries. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
Emur
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Roster Assessment, 2025 Off-Season
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
