Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 690342" data-attributes="member: 7261">Should we only be allowed to have a second opinion if our first opinion 3 months ago was right?  That is how I interpret your question.  If that is the correct interpretation, then read no further.Pretty simple really, the 53 man roster and 10 man PS that we saw in September, has not been as good as what many of us thought and apparently what the people who make the decisions thought either.  The evidence of that is what we have seen on the field over the course of 10 games.  If you want to keep score, my opinion of the WR's and ILB's in August was much lower than most.  But that doesn't make me smart/dumb, just a fan with an opinion.Not sure why my opinion, right or wrong, of the 53+ players can't change over time, especially after seeing some of them actually play in a real game.  Remember, I don't attend every practice, watch film, talk to players, etc.  These are the things TT and the coaching staff get paid to do.  So their level of knowledge is always way ahead of an average Joe such as myself.Opinions are what make this Forum fun.  We all have them, many of us agree and disagree, but just because our initial opinion was wrong, that should not preclude us from formulating another one.  I actually laugh when I type or read "IMO", its like we all have to quantify that it's our opinion, of course it is, we are the ones typing it.</blockquote>

Total: 89 (members: 1, guests: 88)