Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GreenBaySlacker" data-source="post: 700736" data-attributes="member: 9780">If Guion or Daniels were to go down right now, the whole defense would take a huge stap back imo.  Guion needs to be resigned as well IMO. He has been a very reasonable priced contributor in his time here... I really like him a lot.Clark hasn't shown that he could step in and replace Guion yet.  If we added a good young stump of a NT. Keep Guion, Clark continues to develop (which will take less time at DE IMO). And with daniels, we have the ability to play a solid rotation to keep the big boys fresh and healthy all year.Im just Curious. Say we get a good rookie NT. and why would we need to release Guion?Lets say we didn't get a big NT rookie, and Daniels blows a knee in preseason... You comfortable playing next year with what we have??? Im not.I said since minute 1 that Clark should be a DE. Could he grow into NT?  I think he could with time. But he could play DE now. Its dumb not to do so IMO. If we wanted a NT to replace Raji, we should have got a NT then...</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 769 (members: 0, guests: 769)