Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 682308" data-attributes="member: 7261">I'm only guessing, but I imagine we will see Pennel (or Jackson) activated for tomorrows game and this was a way to do that without cutting another player they valued more then Callahan.  The Packers information on the likelihood of Callahan not being grabbed was obviously wrong.While I wasn't a fan of carrying Callahan on the 53, its apparent now that it was the only option if they wanted to protect him.  I would be interested to know if they pulled a Sitton like move again and didn't shop him, if at all, in a timely fashion for a trade?Calculated risk, they lost.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 39 (members: 0, guests: 39)