Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 829230" data-attributes="member: 10086">Well it’s true you could say many QBs will take time to mature. But we know theres a decent # of QBs that come in competing for a starting role year 1 also, particularly 1st round grades. While that is unlikely in our case he competed for a primary role, we know that more reps you get a guy the faster he matures in a program. It’s a decision the FO would have to feel comfortable with as far as how he’s maturing. The only thing I’d note is I’m not advocating him unless he’s a late 1st round pick and we’ve got the resources with a trade back. Using #44 and an acquired #76 is that example if he slides. In this example we’d still have pick #15 and pick #30, then resuming at pick #75.That’s basically using #44 for him mixed with a little craftiness. I’d be ok getting him in that scenario or something similar. It would give him that year to mature where the better echelon college QBs seem to flourish. The other angle to consider is to pick a QB sleeper day 3 to compete for a backup role.</blockquote>

Total: 83 (members: 3, guests: 80)