Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's Pre-Draft Visits Tracker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 829230" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Well it’s true you could say many QBs will take time to mature. But we know theres a decent # of QBs that come in competing for a starting role year 1 also, particularly 1st round grades. While that is unlikely in our case he competed for a primary role, we know that more reps you get a guy the faster he matures in a program. It’s a decision the FO would have to feel comfortable with as far as how he’s maturing.</p><p> The only thing I’d note is I’m not advocating him unless he’s a late 1st round pick and we’ve got the resources with a trade back. Using #44 and an acquired #76 is that example if he slides. In this example we’d still have pick #15 and pick #30, then resuming at pick #75.</p><p></p><p>That’s basically using #44 for him mixed with a little craftiness. I’d be ok getting him in that scenario or something similar. It would give him that year to mature where the better echelon college QBs seem to flourish. </p><p></p><p>The other angle to consider is to pick a QB sleeper day 3 to compete for a backup role.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 829230, member: 10086"] Well it’s true you could say many QBs will take time to mature. But we know theres a decent # of QBs that come in competing for a starting role year 1 also, particularly 1st round grades. While that is unlikely in our case he competed for a primary role, we know that more reps you get a guy the faster he matures in a program. It’s a decision the FO would have to feel comfortable with as far as how he’s maturing. The only thing I’d note is I’m not advocating him unless he’s a late 1st round pick and we’ve got the resources with a trade back. Using #44 and an acquired #76 is that example if he slides. In this example we’d still have pick #15 and pick #30, then resuming at pick #75. That’s basically using #44 for him mixed with a little craftiness. I’d be ok getting him in that scenario or something similar. It would give him that year to mature where the better echelon college QBs seem to flourish. The other angle to consider is to pick a QB sleeper day 3 to compete for a backup role. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Team Ronny
Schultz
Sanguine camper
Catamount1971
Todd Princl
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Todd Princl
14 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Todd Princl
17 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Posting draft picks
Latest: lambeaulambo
44 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Dantés
Today at 5:09 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: thequick12
Today at 4:34 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's Pre-Draft Visits Tracker
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top