Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's Pre-Draft Visits Tracker
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 829202"><p>Again, how are you going to convince somebody to pay up to have you swap out of your impending #12 Lock pick when you're willing to trade him away? It becomes more implausible that your #12 Lock pick is legitimate given he'd be a backup far into the foreseeable future. That might have been plausible if the Packers had not signed Rodgers to that contract. Not anymore.</p><p></p><p>If there's any smoke screen at all it's to get somebody to trade up above #12, making the Packers pick effectively the #11, and that's assuming somebody buys into the implausibility. That's a lot of time and trouble for what is not likely to be very convincing while the advantage may be none at all.</p><p></p><p>The most plausible reason to interview Lock is they have an interest at #30 or maybe #44 if there is an unexpected drop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HardRightEdge, post: 829202"] Again, how are you going to convince somebody to pay up to have you swap out of your impending #12 Lock pick when you're willing to trade him away? It becomes more implausible that your #12 Lock pick is legitimate given he'd be a backup far into the foreseeable future. That might have been plausible if the Packers had not signed Rodgers to that contract. Not anymore. If there's any smoke screen at all it's to get somebody to trade up above #12, making the Packers pick effectively the #11, and that's assuming somebody buys into the implausibility. That's a lot of time and trouble for what is not likely to be very convincing while the advantage may be none at all. The most plausible reason to interview Lock is they have an interest at #30 or maybe #44 if there is an unexpected drop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Arodgers12
sschind
Latest posts
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Voyageur
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
A
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Arodgers12
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
If you were GM, what is your ideal draft?
Latest: tynimiller
22 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: PikeBadger
42 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packer's Pre-Draft Visits Tracker
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top